Week of April 15, 2013

Spring Talks on Mass and Count

Monday, April 15 | 9:30am-1pm | Fong Auditorium (Boylston Hall, First Floor)
 "                     " | 1-4:30pm | Boylston 303

9:30am

Susan Rothstein: Measuring, counting and the mass count distinction

Much previous work on the mass/count distinction (Chierchia 1998,2010, Gillon 1992, Rothstein 2010, Landman 2011, Bale and Barner 2009) has focused on the properties of the denotations of mass and count nouns respectively. In this talk, I suggest addressing the issue from a different starting point, namely the contrast between measuring and counting operations. Mass nouns denote entities which can be measured, while count nouns denote entities whose atomic parts can be counted. The correct way to represent the denotation of mass and count nouns must allow for a plausible application of measure and counting operations respectively.

11:00am
Gennaro Chierchia: How universal is the mass/count distinction? Three grammars of counting
12:30pm
Lunch
2:00pm

Suzi Lima: The count/mass distinction in Yudja (Tupi): individuadion and counting

In the literature on the count-mass noun distinction, the impossibility of combining mass nouns with numerals is a grammatical property associated with mass nouns cross-linguistically (cf. Chierchia 2010). In this presentation I will discuss the count/mass distinction in Yudja

3:00pm

Roberta Pires de Oliveira: Comparitives in Brazilian Portuguese

Bale and Barner (2009) argue that comparatives are the most reliable test for the mass/count distinction, and they claim that languages with the mass/count distinction behave as English. This prediction is not borne out for Bare Singular comparatives in Brazilian Portuguese. Bare singulars in comparatives behave as fake mass in English, since they allow for different scales of comparison: cardinal, volume, weight.We review the data and, relying on Rothstein (2010), propose that bare singulars are derived from root nouns which are non-individuated lattice structures, so they may be differently measured; whereas the plural noun has already a unity in it, so it can only be counted.

3:30pm
Final Remarks

Polinsky Lab Meeting

Nina Radkevich and Greg Scontras
Gender Attraction in Spanish
Wednesday, April 17 | 5:15-7pm | Polinsky Lab Room 420 (Conference Room)

GSAS Indo-European Workshop

Alexander Nikolaev (Harvard University/Brandeis University)
Alcaeus 34: Sometimes a Ship is Just a Ship
Friday, April 19 | 4-5:30pm | Boylston 104

Keith Plaster to Brandeis

Congratulations to Keith Plasterwho will be a lecturer in the Language and Linguistics Program at Brandeis University starting Fall, 2013.

Harvard at CLS

Cheng-Yu Edwin Tsai will be presenting his work, "On a proper treatment of interrogative scope in Chinese wh-in-situ," at the 49th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society April 18-20.

Jenny Lee Awarded NSF/NEH Grant

Congratulations to Jenny Lee, who has recently been awarded a Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant for her project "Blafe Documentation and Description" by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) through the Documenting Endangered Languages program.

logo.png
 Radcliffe Presentation Series: Angelika Kratzer

Angelika Kratzer (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; University of Massachusetts, Amherst)
Mapping Possibilities (Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study 2012-2013 Fellows Presentation Series)
Monday, April 22 | 4pm | Sheerr Room, Fay House (10 Garden Street, Cambridge MA)

Angelika Kratzer’s area of specialization is semantics, an interdisciplinary field located at the intersection of linguistics, cognitive psychology, logic, and philosophy. Her research concerns how natural languages are constructed so as to make it possible for humans to assemble complex meanings systematically from small and simple pieces. Humans talk about mere possibilities: what might have been, could be, or should be. Our notions of what is possible, inevitable, likely, or desirable are fundamentally the same and highly systematic, and this is why they have attracted the attention of mathematicians, logicians, and philosophers for more than 2,000 years. The talk will illustrate how the distinctively human faculty of language interacts with other knowledge resources to help us manipulate and keep track of possibilities – sometimes for serious, sometimes just for fun.